So, it's clear BEV HGVs offer a tangible pathway to reduced carbon and enhanced sustainability for timber supply chains and the wider haulage sector.
However, ex forest haulage requires a flexibility the charging infrastructure simply can’t support at this time. From this, some regions, and hence, some parts of the supply chain, are more ready for electrification than others at this time.
This is improving and will resolve in the near-term, but it is worthy of consideration that HGVs are only part of the forest supply chain in that forwarders, harvesters, graders etc. also require diesel. A more practical approach is to explore parallel opportunities around greener lower emission ‘drop in fuels’ that can integrate with existing assets.
Good news is the amazing project team is already working on it. For example, The WaterHorse project is achieving 85% reductions in tailpipe emissions using HVO which is interchangeable with diesel.
Similarly, BioForestDrive is exploring methanol as an alternative which does require some modifications, but the fuel can be extracted from renewable and sustainable biomass, and can be split to hydrogen for direct use as a fuel, or use in Fuel Cell EVs which could support other alternative drive trains and solves remote charging for the BEVs.
The recent ICF Decarbonising Forest Transport event in Lockerbie also highlighted “hidden” decarbonisation opportunities which are huge once all of the heavy plant at sawmills and the millions of movements are considered. It was great to hear about current and future battery options and the practicalities of deploying low carbon options.
Essentially, the Net Zero Timhaul is a great and timely demonstration that BEVs are the answer, that they do work, but, if we are to achieve zero emission HGV transport by 2040, we’ll need all of these technologies, and the industry, and other sectors working in synergy towards a future fit supply chain.
The future is bright, the future is forestry.